How To Pray Through A Seizure (PART II): Dirt

Funny how memories and my ability to describe them if given enough time has a way of composing itself into something rich and new and meaningful. Some things slipped right through into composition, and other sticks and rocks are stuck in the sifter and cast aside for later years to granulate and rot. It is similar to how my father’s compost pile gets filtered down at the limen between our property and the woodland green. The mind is nourished if not traumatized by the heat of experience; it is in those decaying decomposition of fleeting moments that I find my salt as a writer. Those little sprouts springing up I refer to them as recollections of soul.

May 1st, 2022— Jonathan had sent me a text that evening prior to please not have another seizure. He had enough little fires going on with a lot of people calling out sick, and he didn’t need any more on his plate. I offered to set up church service with him. He told me he’d pick me up at 7:45 the next morning and drive us over.

Question: Why didn’t I just meet him over at church instead? Why is he still picking me up? God bless him! I mean, according to my last blog post, I had just gotten my driver’s license back, right?

Let me reset the stage for a moment, unstack the chairs, and prepare for this church assembly like Solomon did a couple thousand years ago where all of his striving after the wind, circled back around under the sun. I turned on the lights. Camera. Action. Are we recording now? *Sigh* I recall…

December 29th, 2021— While celebration resumed on finally getting my driver’s license back with two friends of mine Steve and Sue over at Two Stones Restaurant on the corner of Naamans & Foulk, I had another seizure while finishing my burger and chips. I remember Steve calling 911. I also heard the sound of a woman voice beside me. Who was she? Her voice was blurry and rest of the details fuzzy, but I was stuck in my own mantra of prayer. I said and repeated to myself, “Lord God Control! Lord God Control!” I convulsed until the quiet dwelt within.

The ambulance shipped me off yet again to Crozer Medical Hospital. I gowned up. And I was strapped into an EKG machine. And I had to observe the bright and chaotic lights and shadows of Neuro ER room overnight while they too observed me. Their staff never ended up putting in a regular room. There I stayed right outside of the ER front desk; the hospital had a triage of sorts; they were hemorrhaging due to their own staffing issues, something to do with threats of a strike according to the local newspapers.

A doctor, who was performing one of his routine rounds, informed me that he was a mandated reporter to the state, and the state would suspend my driver’s license for another next six months. Again. This nameless face also tentatively upped my anti-seizure medication from 500 milligrams of Depakote ER (extended release) to 750 a day. Later my neurologist made this protocol permanent. The following morning, I had rung the bell again and again for a 9 AM dose. I didn’t receive my dose until 10:45 AM. I feared that I might lose control with another seizure if I had to wait any longer I would get another one any moment.

Hospitals are supposed to be a place to rest, but my stay there were all but restful. The number one indicator to the onset of a seizure is sleep deprivation. I remained wide awake the whole night. The department was littered with the audio wallpaper of alarm fatigue. I heard the annoyance of a heart monitor beeping and hyper-aware of the compression at regular intervals of a blood pressure cuff. I remember sleeping most of the next day. I had to cut off all the electrode pads from my chest hair once the shower didn’t do the trick. A minor inconvenience. That was nothing by comparison to my ten day stay before and after brain surgery plus an additional 21 days after that for rehabilitation. Nothing!

A word to the wise and to anyone else going forward: wait at least three minute before calling an ambulance if I do go into a seizure. I was told this by my neurologist from a follow up appointment with him. He had me sent to get an EEG or an electroencephalogram done the month prior on November 23. The clinician put me through every rigmarole test of flashing lights to trigger the onset of a seizure. (By the way, sudden sounds are more likely to induce a spasm than any flashing light could.) And after a reading from my electroencephalograph, staff concluded my current anti-seizure meds worked well-enough that day that they signed off my permission form to get my license back from the DMV. A few weeks later, I got my notice; I could drive again. How short lasting that was! Only three places I drove: to and from the Christmas Eve church service, dropping Jonathan off to the airport to see his family Christmas day, and lunch on December 29th.

And for the several months leading up to that rubber stamp approval, my father and I had been practicing driving monotonous circles around in an empty school parking lot like I did with him as a teenager. I had to relearn my childhood-to-adulthood skill-sets. However, this the process was much shorter, thirty-one years compressed into a matter of months. Yet I found the relearning process to be a much more frustrating and debilitating than I anticipated. I didn’t like back then the word ‘frustrating’. Frustrating was a phrase tossed at me to describe my current situation from a sympathetic audience, but I took it from my perspective as a form of casting stones, one rock over top of another pressing down until I couldn’t bear the weight. I took offense to the negative cogitation I thought of it. I associated ‘frustrating’ with Pavlovian behavioral psychology, the emotive reflexes of mind without its reasons. The dog salivates for treats without knowing why, and I refused to be coaxed into gentle comfort like cattle before the slaughter. Instead, the word I used at the time was experiencing a cogitative simplex. The subsequent months after brain surgery I felt too removed from myself, too dumbed down, too drugged up or any combination of the three to even have anything remote to a psychological complex. Cognitive simplex I figured would have to do as a term in the meantime.

My father told me that he was more concerned with my reaction time more so than anything else. See, the left side of my body had been paralyzed due to the complications of two seizures during the operation. The technical term is called hemiplegia and it’s similar to someone who had just have had a stroke, thus that’s why I spent an extra month in rehab and an another couple months with at-home therapy visited several times a week by three staff members over at Mercy Health: a physical therapist; an occupational therapist; and a cognitive therapist. But that’s for another story.

 

***

 

Who I want to be and who I am are two different beings. Who I am want to be is someone fiercely independent. Clearly I’m not. And who I am is someone entrapped by his own convalescence. Similar to more ancient and biblical times, my primal mind associated sin with the physical ailment. Lepers were not only unclean, but they had a spiritual uncleanliness to them as well.

My more ancient self asked, what ritual cleansing do I need to be clean?

What I do I need to do? What is my purpose? In other words, what does God need from me?

So first off, let’s be clear here: God doesn’t need anything from us. He’s God, and I am not Him. The divide between Creator and creation is defined by scripture. I mulled over this fact after a sermon Pastor Will Stern did on March 20th concerning 1 Timothy 6:13-16. (See video link here.)

 

I charge you in the presence of God, who gives life to all things, and of Christ Jesus, who in his testimony before Pontius Pilate made the good confession, to keep the commandment unstained and free from reproach until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ,  which he will display at the proper time—he who is the blessed and only Sovereign, the King of kings and Lord of lords,  who alone has immortality, who dwells in unapproachable light, whom no one has ever seen or can see. To him be honor and eternal dominion. Amen.

 

In his sermon, a distinction is made between communicable and incommunicable attributes of God. Communicable attributes are those that can be communicated to his creatures. God is love; we are loving. God is faithful; we are faithful. Although we are not always that way, God is. The incommunicable acts are those that cannot be communicated to God that is unique to God alone. If a creature would possess these attributes, they would be gods themselves: all powerful, atemporal (exist beyond the confines of time), and the source of all life. His three incommunicable attributes include His independence, His sovereignty, and His incomprehensibility.

Pastor Will then look out into the congregation and asked them a rhetorical statement. Are these concepts such as God incommunicable attributes relevant to our day-to-day life? Or is this some sort of lofty abstract ivory-tower image of God when people like Chris Battin who shared earlier in the service how people are struggling with their drug addiction on the streets of Kennington Avenue?

 I looked over to Chris. He visited us that week to share his ministry outreach. The man reminded me of a Mr. Rogers figure. He wore a button-down cardigan vest and orthopedic-styled shoes. Hard to imagine him walking the streets of inner-city Philadelphia handing out bananas and water to addicts and prostitutes. I remember thinking yes! His view of God does appear awfully lofty you might say. And to ask such a formulatic turn-of-phrase would mean he would later cut it down like any straw man argument. I scuffed at the remark.

     Remember I have some control issues I’m working through. My tendency to lean much more into the thrust and gusto of diatribes and turning over the moneychangers tables of Mark than to conduct what I saw as pointless theological nitpicking showcased for instance in the Gospel of John. At least here I could make myself useful to something in the greater body of Christ. Here are my hands. And here are my feet. Or that was my thinking.

Yet again I might be too harsh a critic toward high-minded theology because I myself have the tendency of using the everyman and the downtrodden as a human shield against God to deflect his glory and distract him away from my own flaws.

Skeptical, I kept listening.

According to Pastor Will, the apostle Paul is rooting his command for Timothy (and as an extension all of us) in why he should persevere and fight the good fight. We should be doing in light of who God is. It’s not irrelevant, but it strikes at the heart of human pride. As well, God is independent, and not some abstract conception. He is love. The pastor continued and explained that in western society, we like to think we are independent but we’re not. Think of the food in your refrigerator. Someone had to grow the food, transport the food, stock the shelves, and money to buy the food. We are all profoundly dependent on each other.

Yes, true enough. It’s one thing to say we are dependent on one another in society (even the most self-reliant of folk), but what does that have to do with God?

Louis Berkhof writes about our dependency not only on each other but on God as well. In his book Systematic Theology he notes, “As the self-existent-god, the one who exists as the Great I AM, he is not only independent of himself, but also causes everything to depend on him.”

Pastor Will continued. He said that our belly button is also a testimony to our dependency. This pride shattering sign of dependency is the basis of our worship. As well if there anything that might stick with us is that Jesus too had a belly button. He was born of the virgin Mary. He was fully man, fully God. He was dependent like us, and independent like His Heavenly Father. He serves both as the bridge and gap fulfilled to our salvation.

I most certainly am not God, not independent, and not sovereign. That’s for sure, but I still struggle with that obvious truth. I think I’m starting to relearn my psychological complex again!

 

***

 

So let me rearrange the yearning of this question. What do I need from God? What’s my small but inadequate contribution to His purpose? Not my own, His?

In Marilynne Robinson’s novel Gilead, the narrator John Ames writes when nearing his death due to a heart condition, “To be useful was the best thing the old men can hope for themselves, and to be aimless was their greatest fear.” My much younger self (who has been recently contemplating his own mortality well beyond his years) struggles with this question more on a hands-on level rather than a hypothetical theological garble of someday. See! There’s a spasticity when flicking the water away after washing my hands (it shakes). Or there’s a general weakness I feel when lifting my coffee cup to my lips. The thought lingers: if I can’t do these simple things, how can I attempt to do anything greater than beyond these trivial tasks. I grow tired of these repetitive mediocre exercises. Prayer doesn’t feel like enough to quench my thirst, (I want to do more and be useful) but prayer is something I hold onto with my shaky left hand to sip on. That and reading.

The only novel I’ve cried while reading was Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes. In that epistolary novel, Charley Gordan is a mentally-challenged man of 68 IQ who had been selected as the prime candidate for a new experimental operation. Scientists have found similar positive results with improving the IQ of lab mice including its lead subject, a mouse named Algernon. Charley goes and gets the operation done, and over the next few months his IQ more than triples surpassing even those of his scientists. However, midway through the novel, Algernon is acting not like himself. He bites Charles out of impulsiveness, and come to find out, Charley’s intelligence too is only ephemeral and soon will be fleeting. In the upcoming months, he would regress like his mouse and begin to be haunted by his former self. He publishes a paper in a scientific journal titling his findings The Algernon-Gordan Effect. He records that in several months he would return back to his mentally-handicapped-self as before. As I read the later half of the novel, I slowly watched page-after-page his spelling and grammar slowly deteriorate. Never in my life have I been so moved by the decay of language. In his final journal entry before he was to put away into a group home facility up in New York because he couldn’t handle the pity of others, he asked to his unrequited love interest, Miss Alice Kinnian, his former teacher at the Beekman College Center for Retarded Adults, to please put flowers on the grave for Algernon. I cried at the ending.

I summarized that novel to help you better understand how much of a chip on my shoulder when it came to my own intellect. I’ve been prideful on that mark. I cried not only for Charley but also for in part myself if I was in his situation. I thought of myself as smart, and I had this ambition and drive to make a name for myself as a writer. (And may I add I still do.) I joked and ragged with Jonathan some two years ago as he was stuck just nodding for parts of the conversation because he didn’t have any comical comebacks, I blurted out to him, “It’s okay to be boring. Get used to it!” I was so caught up in all of my hubris wit and ego, I didn’t hear the hypocrisy in my own voice until I began to compare my former chats with him to the ones in the months following post-operation. I found myself speechless and quite boring indeed. I was scared to even talk to Jonathan let alone other people in my attempt to be perceived by others that I was still smart, not slow to speech. I spent a lot of my time after church appearing helpful by putting away chairs with my strong arm and weak arm to assist the best I could rather than congregating with others in the back. This was my vain attempt to not make myself the fool.

November 3, 2021—that evening, we met for our weekly Bible study. To close at the end of all our studies, we go around the room to pray, to give thanks, and lift up to God on behalf of each other, our community, our nation, and world at large. Please note: I don’t like to make myself the center of attention (despite my ego). Besides my own baptism and the occasional thanks before a meal, I never felt before like I needed much of any prayer. That was better left to those whom were left on their death bed or some supernatural ¡Ave Maria! request; rather than some trivial matters on my part I could solve. But then came a matter I couldn’t!

It’s one thing to treat prayer as one does to an acute medicinal treatment, but this plea to God was becoming chronic. Week-after-week, day-after-day, and basically all of the time I’ve been inundated with prayer. The whole lifting up process had grown irksome to me and I impatient with it. Those what I thought to be conciliatory prayers over me were becoming a bit of a grind. I had complained to Jonathan enough so that he jokingly notified the group to please not pray on my behalf. And of course, like reverse psychology, what did everyone want to do as a result? I was told by Heather who hosted us that evening at her and her husband’s house I didn’t that much of a choice of the matter. It was a free country after all. God bless America!

That evening, after I finished my own rambling disorienting prayer on someone’s else behalf, Steve said to the group (after all the amens were done) that it reminded him of John Bunyan’s allegoric novel The Holy War. In one part of the story, that all the people desire to send a message to God. However, the people worried whether their words would come out alright. And the messenger called Holy Spirit said that he would rewrite and make it perfect.

When I heard, I felt conflicted if not mad at God. The thought: it was my prayer, not God’s prayer to reconfigure and revise. How dare He?

And there goes me with my control issues again.

 

***

 

I remember while in rehab over Taylor Hospital, a cognitive therapist named Chrissy walked into my room. My father had been in the room after his work that day to visit me. It was his or my mother’s but not both (let alone anyone else’s) turn to visit me. They still maintained their one-visit-a-day stipulation due to Covid restrictions. I never saw below Chrissy’s nose, but as I told another nurse she had the eyelashes of butterfly wings. My regular cognitive therapy guy Mike told me how impressed she was over my math skills. My mother also told me how much of a wiz I was at doing all these differential equations and of the sort over at Crozer. Someone had told her this, although I don’t remember doing so myself. I still maintained the story without questioning it. My future as a mathematician was my consolation prize for getting brain surgery. The term I used back then was getting brain-damaged. I was told by staff and my parents it was impolite to use that word and to please use a nicer one. I couldn’t think of one at the time.

The other myth about me I maintained and told others was that with all the steroids they’ve given me, through all my thrashing roid rage, I grew by another two inches taller. I was a solid 6 foot instead of my 5 foot 10 inch self. That bubble had also burst the day of August 9th when a doctor was also told in paraphrase: Well, you know that brain surgeon who got it all? Well, he didn’t get all of it. The results from your pathology report came back, and from biopsy of your anaplastic astrocystoma it shows it’s a grade 3 tumor, but good news! it’s of the IDH mutant gene which means this cancer won’t spread throughout the rest of your body, however you will need to go through a one-year regiment of chemotherapy and radiation to get the rest of it out, and of course I strongly advised you to take ________. Why aren’t you interested? I mean if you have any concern you can discuss them with me now. I crumbled up his business card with my strong fist instead. By the way for the record I am 5 foot 10 1/2 inches tall. A nurse told me after getting my height and weight. Yes, I count gaining the half inch like a toddler who has something prove of his maturity, although fisting his business card was clearly not a sign of it!

The neurosurgeon warned me of my tendency toward impulsiveness after surgery. I didn’t fully grasp what he meant post-operation. Was I likely to go out start up a gambling addiction or drive recklessly? No. Instead my conflict was more intimate. Before I would have had a more stoic face about me. If I didn’t, I wore my mask much better in social situations. Now I have a much harder time to control my emotional expressions. I may used often dollar words but I expressed with the body language of pennies. At face, I look fine; but in private, I’ve been mostly took it out on myself when no one else is looking. Perhaps I should ask God to stop punishing myself with punches, to stop hitting myself in the head. A few times my mother caught me the act. She sat me down and demanded to know why I did that. I said that I didn’t know. Had it been anyone else, she would have knocked them to the ground. I replied that I really didn’t know. I didn’t. Still don’t.

Maybe I’m angry with my brain tumor. Or the void and scar tissue it left behind. Or more so the fact I can’t control my lot in life behind my veil, my emotions. I feel exposed and open to ridicule. I can still see the two dents on my head above my temples. It was as if God tore the curtain in two top to bottom as some sort of prophecy I still can’t grasp its meaning. If I was the preacher from Ecclesiastes, I would have been angry at my own holy-of-holies, at wisdom itself. I’d imagine myself saying All of it is hevel, this breath that fogs my glasses; and after all of my pushing forward, I came around here again doing all of these repetitive monotonous exercises like prayer. All of it is a striving after the wind. Again. But that just my speculation. I don’t know where this spurred. My best guess is the sin of pride.

 

 ***

 

July 2021— I remember lined up on my window sill during rehab was an array of cards full of well wishes and prayers. And there also sat a vase of sunflowers wilting before my eyes. Jonathan handed it to me fresh from Roseanne on his first of several Saturday visits. Unable to get up myself without the alarms ringing off from my bed, he cut off the bottom stems and place the flower vase on the sill of Room 421 which overlooked Chester Pike and a Wawa gas station in the midst of construction. But those sunflowers man! Wow! They’re strange creatures. It is said that the flowers to maximize its light exposure always face the sun until it’s fully grown. Then they face due East. It was the heat of July, but inside the room it was cool and sterile. The sunflowers knew it and felt it. I thought naively they were following the sun (or at least the faulty fluorescent tubes above), but no, they were dying. However I knew it not. I thought I was going to live forever or at least a nice ripe old age of 108. That and I made a promise to God that I was going to have six children someday. Not five, not seven but six. Every nurse that came was a potential mate. Drugged up, I only asked two nurses to marry me. I felt both the sense of immortality and also the immediacy to live in the present because this life is short. I confided with Jonathan “See that woman. I’m going to marry her someday.” I waved. She smile, but only half my face smiled back. The other half mimicked but drooped some. Then Jonathan filled the vase from the sink faucet, and the flowers disoriented knew not which direction they go. So as the days passed, I marveled at their withering.

I reflected and regurgitate often the cherry-picked verse Isaiah 40:8, “The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our Lord is forever.” Later I was reminded of this passage months later on May 1st, 2022 during an adult Sunday class. I open up my Bible and instead of reading that passage I read the two verses prior, Isaiah 40:6-7 where “all flesh is grass” and “surely we are the grass.” Grass we are indeed!

July 2022— Chrissy my other cognitive therapist sat next to me. It was the same day my father came to visit. I forget the date, except for that day a nurse tested me what date of the week it was; that was everyday; all other days were a blur. Chrissy handed me some math problems. They seemed simple enough. And I was a math-wiz after all. But after reading the words on the page,  I thought this can’t be right, that this here was a trick question. What kind of high level calculus is this!? Then I looked down at the paper. The words were big. Too big. And on the side was labeled K-5 learning. Then I asked Chrissy how dumb was I? If given for instance a flesh-kincard reading scale (I couldn’t conjure up the word at the time…) so I recall saying if given on a point system, what did she think my grade level was at? First grade? Second? What about third?  In other words, how stunted was I? I think the term I used back then was retarded. Again not polite.

I couldn’t quite get her expression through the face mask, but she fluttered those lids more than usual. My father in the corner of the room asked if it was okay to excuse himself. He said that it might be better for the two of us to discuss this matter in private. She said, no and to please sit back down. He was fine where he was. Her words came across sweet, its nectar perhaps too sweet to the taste of this numbers guy. She told me that I had a slight impairment to right frontal region of the brain which included more abstract thinking like language based math problems.

I didn’t have a math problem. I could add. I had a language problem. I was lost, cut from my roots, and clipped from the stem. I knew not my way out of a prepositional soup. I was drowning in my words. For many hours I gaze out at the sun, its rising and setting, and the harshness of the summer heat. As well, I ignored the best I could the fluorescent glow and rolling carts behind me

I remember this one woman, a nurse named Abby I was dead set on marrying, the same one I confided to Jonathan about. When Abby checked up on me, my spine straighten up and threw my shoulders back, but my left arm dangled as dead weight. I had enough sense at this point to not propose to her yet. I was beaming that as she told another nurse during a shift change that the patient in Room 421 has been doing really well as of late. That was the last time I saw her before being shipped home from rehab.

Abby, if you’re reading this, we should set up a date sometime and get know one another better like naming all our future children. I’m joking. Half joking. I have planned out our first three kiddos, and we can discuss the rest.

 

***

 

I have a chronic ailment of being prideful. Let me present the forward thrust: my intellect. The battle I used to play was a battle of smarts and sometimes other people got hurt. It was a sparring match of minds where I outmaneuvered my opponent. Now I struggle to control my tongue, speech, and thought. Out of a blindness of faith, I replaced my sharpness of wit for a blunt dullness of a crayon. Now humbled, I’m trying to learn how to have more faith. It’s really hard.

I can relate to the fictional character Charlie Gordon in one key transformational way. We both learned the hard way that wisdom has nothing to do with intelligence. I am reminded of this truth every Sunday at our current weekly sermon series on the book of Ecclesiastes. Each week, the message of futility is preached “under the sun”. Wisdom is something deeper than that. It is the dirt. From dust we came and to dust we return. We may be limited by our own emulation up to lofty heights in our own tower of Babel, but man knows no bounds by his ignorance! We are all Solomon. We are all the preacher at lost for his words, our words, my words and speechless before Almighty God.

God, I hope to never have another seizure again, but if I do I hope to have that image of repentance firmly planted in my head. To this, I pray to Christ Jesus. Amen.

Spiritual Deception is a Serious Danger

Richard Turner is the G.O.A.T. card sharp. On his YouTube videos, Turner seems to shuffle and deal card in a normal, straight-forward way. But he is deceptively controlling every single card being dealt. With each shuffle, Turner is arranging the cards to his liking. Then, instead of dealing from the top of the deck, Turner can easily and deceivingly deal the second card from the top of the deck or any other card he chooses from the middle or bottom of the deck without being noticed. Turner has honed his skills with more than 150,000 hours of practice over five decades. While Turner mostly uses his skills for entertainment, he has demonstrated his card manipulation talents in other ways. People have tried to beat Turner by cutting a higher card from the deck. Most people give up after losing a dozen or so times in a row. A world-class card counter once bragged to a casino that his blackjack system would always win. Turner was the dealer as this expert demonstrated his system. Over two hours the expert did not win a single hand.

Audiences allow magicians to deceive and fool them for entertainment and amusement. But spiritual deception is a serious danger we must recognize and resist. If we consider Satan’s many names, we can better understand this enemy, his allies, and their schemes. In God’s Word, Satan is referred to as a deceiver, an accuser, the evil one, a liar, a murderer, the power of darkness, a slanderer, a tempter, and the wicked one. The Devil has earned these names by honing his ability to deceive, to foster doubts, and to separate people from God since the days of Adam and Eve.

We can also be deceived by others. Sometimes the deception is knowing and intentional; other times it is inadvertent or careless. Either way, the spiritual damage is real. Our friends, neighbors, family, co-workers, and enemies can say things or do things that make us doubt God’s goodness and lovingkindness, or to weaken our trust in His promises. We should raise our defenses when someone finds a new interpretation of God’s Word or argues for disobeying a clear Biblical teaching.

Perhaps worst of all is that we can deceive ourselves. “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked.” (Jeremiah 17) “There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death.” (Proverbs 14) We need faithful brothers and sisters, and godly spiritual leaders to keep us on the straight and narrow path that leads to godliness and life.

We must be prepared to recognize and resist spiritual deception in all its forms and from all its sources. We are never too old to heed the words of the children’s song, “be careful little eyes what you see … be careful little ears what you hear … be careful little heart who you trust…” Thankfully the Holy Spirit guides us away from spiritual deception and into all truth. (John 16) And we have been promised a wonderful future when there will be no more deception or sin of any kind. (Revelation 20)

A Presbyterian’s Reflection on the “Rise and Fall of Mars Hill”

I recently listened to a riveting and sobering podcast, produced by Christianity Today, called the “Rise and Fall of Mars Hill” about Mark Driscoll and the collapse of his Reformed-leaning megachurch in Seattle called Mars Hill. It was especially fascinating for me as a pastor and church planter because I lived through the height of Driscoll’s popularity in my college years. And, though I was never a fan of Mark Driscoll personally, I attended a retreat at a church that initially funded Mars Hill, I once had dinner with a pastor from Mars Hill, and I have many friends who planted churches through Acts 29, a network once associated with Mars Hill. Thus, the podcast hit very close to home.

But what are my reflections after listening? There are a lot of things that could be said. And this article isn’t a comprehensive review of the podcast (If you’re interested in more, I found this article from 9 Marks very helpful). 

But as a Presbyterian minister, I kept coming back to this thought over and over again: “If only they had the BCO...” 

Now, as I say that, I imagine Presbyterian ministers laughing and many others saying, “What in the world are you talking about?” For those who don’t know, BCO stands for “Book of Church Order.” You can read it here if you’re interested. It is a dense and wise document that guides the government, discipline, and worship of my denomination, the Presbyterian Church in America (PCA). In fact, it is divided into three sections: The Form of Government, the Rules of Discipline, and the Directory for the Worship of God. 

As a side note, the BCO was the weakest subject for my ordination exams back in 2015. I did a great job on history, theology, and Bible but nearly failed the BCO. But since that time, I’ve come to see the wisdom and importance of this book. Though its details often seem tedious, it is indispensable for the church. Thus – “if only Mars Hill had the BCO!” 

Though a reformed-leaning church, Mars Hill was not confessionally Reformed. They didn’t have a BCO or a presbytery to hold Mark Driscoll accountable. And in my view, they had an unbiblical form of church government. I don’t believe the wisdom of Presbyterianism is simply a human invention – it flows out of the wisdom of Scripture itself.

Of course, Presbyterian churches aren’t immune to scandal. I am not saying that the BCO is a substitute for godly Christian character (See 1 Timothy 3). As many Presbyterians can attest, the BCO can become a weapon in the hand of a contentious and litigious person. It’s not an inerrant document. It’s not equal to Scripture. And really, nothing is a substitute for godly Christian character, flowing out of the gospel and a sincere love for Christ. 

But despite its limitations, I believe that the BCO is a gift to God’s church that, though imperfect and frail, could’ve protected Mars Hill against some of the excesses of Mark Driscoll’s abusive leadership.

Here are just a few examples:

  • In recordings, Mark Driscoll boasted that he had never been a member of a church or attended seminary before starting Mars Hill. But imagine if he had heeded the wisdom of BCO 18-1, which says, “A candidate for the ministry is a member of the Church in full communion who, believing himself to be called to preach the Gospel, submits himself to the care and guidance of the Presbytery in his course of study and of practical training to prepare himself for this office.” Could this have taught him humility and godly submission? 

  • Mark Driscoll was clearly recognized as arrogant and domineering from the beginning of his ministry, as the podcast recounts. But imagine if those around him had heeded the wisdom of BCO 8-2, which says, “He that fills this office should possess a competency of human learning and be blameless in life, sound in the faith and apt to teach. He should exhibit a sobriety and holiness of life becoming the Gospel. He should rule his own house well and should have a good report of them that are outside the Church.” Could this have made a difference?

  • Mark Driscoll never submitted to anyone in a meaningful way. In fact, Driscoll said that he couldn’t submit to anyone whose church was smaller than his own. But imagine if he had taken the vow of BCO 21-5 to submit to the brethren in the Lord. Could that have made a difference?

  • And once things started to go south at Mars Hill, the elders lost their authority. They had no higher court of appeal. But what if they had a presbytery (BCO 42)? What if higher courts had been reviewing the minutes and procedures of Mars Hill (BCO 40)? Could that have made a difference?

Of course, I could give may more examples. But I hope you understand—I’m not saying that the BCO is the answer to all the Church’s problems. At the most basic level, we need the Bible alone. We need the gospel. We need love for God and love for neighbor. And there are faithful Bible-believing churches without the BCO. 

But as Presbyterians, we should be thankful for the BCO. It’s a gift of God, unpacking the wisdom of God’s Word. We are privileged to possess a book that has been so carefully written and revised throughout history.  And as a pastor, one of my goals is to read through the Book of Church Order more regularly. I want to be thoroughly acquainted with this wise book so that it will be a lifeline for the church when it faces conflict and challenges. And rather than constantly trying to reinvent the church, we should all look to the wisdom of the past. We should look to the wise foundation of the Reformed tradition as reflected in the BCO.  

As a friend said a few years ago, perhaps BCO means “Beautiful Church Order.”


The Gospel in a Folk Tale: “The Tortoise and the Wisdom of the World”

Logic and arguments can sometimes skim over the surface of my mind and skip over the deep parts of my heart. Story, though, even the kind I read to my four year old, pierces me with deep knowledge, the kind that changes you. And if I mull on it, the Gospel is always at the heart of this kind of change. 

The story this time was a fable from Africa I had never read before. Entitled “The Tortoise and the Wisdom of the World,” it is a tale of a tortoise who, because he is wise, decides to make sure that he truly is the wisest creature in the universe. He does this by roaming the whole earth, storing up the wisdom in a gourd that he carried with him. Once he has collected enough wisdom, he thinks, he will certainly be the wisest. 

At last, he rounds out his collection of wisdom; and, not wanting to lose something so precious, he wisely decides to hide it in a tree. I’ll excerpt to get the details right: 

He decided to hide the gourd at the top of a very tall palm tree. To get to the top, he hung the gourd on his neck and tied a rope around himself and the tree to haul himself up. But the gourd was between him and the tree trunk making it difficult to climb. He would make a little progress and slide right back down. Meanwhile, a snail who was passing by had stopped to watch the tortoise. After watching the tortoise slide down the tree yet again, the snail suggested, “Why don’t you throw the gourd behind you instead of hanging it in front?”

The tortoise tried this and easily climbed to the top of the tree. Then he realized how futile his effort was. He had collected all the wisdom in the world, yet the snail had proven wiser than him. He threw the gourd onto the ground where it broke into several pieces allowing all the wisdom in it to escape back into the world. 

This is when the story hit my heart. How often have I, like the tortoise, been growing in knowledge of God and in His wisdom, but been derailed by comparison? When I find myself on social media or even talking to a mom who is making a different parenting choice than me, I find myself questioning my own choices and trying to add on their way of living, even if it isn’t something God has truly worked on my heart, or if it doesn’t fit with our family culture. I treat my freedom in Christ as if it does not exist, and I take on weight of the law of other’s lifestyle. Like the turtle, this makes me tempted to scrap everything, and throw myself down in a petty heap on the floor. 

Through the truth of the Gospel, God meets us in this moment of vulnerability and comparison and shame. Christ took upon himself the pride we take in our flimsy knowing, and died to break its power!! HE ROSE AGAIN that we might be free to walk in a new kind of wisdom, one so free from fear and competition that through it we can laugh joyously at the discovery of another’s greater wisdom, and humbly at its own foolish moments. 

And even if we, like the turtle, compare ourselves to others and give up on our wisdom and the freedom we live out in Christ again and again, God will restore us to freedom and humility. Let us turn to him in repentance and remember again the Jesus who walked among people and never rejected their foolishness (but only the wisdom they held tight in pride).


A Scientist Considers the Origin of Life

The origin of life (OOL) may be the most significant unsolved problem in science, spanning the fields of physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, mathematics, information science, and philosophy. Researchers studying the OOL seek explanations and evidence for how lifeless earth, water, air, and fire followed a chain of events starting with “a warm little pond” of simple chemicals to become the extremely complex and diverse living creatures in the world today, with each step along the way conforming to all scientific laws. News headlines may lead you to believe that we are on the verge of solving the mystery of how life began. Discoveries of water on other planets, complex organic chemicals on meteorites, exoplanets in the “Goldilocks zone,” and laboratory syntheses of biochemical materials from simple building blocks each seem to be the next piece of the puzzle to end all doubt about how creation occurred without a Creator. Nothing could be further from the truth. Perhaps the only agreement within the OOL community is that after a century of research, scientists are further away than ever from reaching a consensus on how life began, and they are clearly seeing how much complexity is necessary for even the simplest living cell. As one OOL scientist admitted in 2010, “Our ignorance about the origin of life is profound—not just some simple missing mechanistic detail.”

While the OOL topics are complicated, it is worth knowing a few details because the more science you know, the more clearly you will see that creation without a Creator is impossible. Here are a handful of the unresolved controversies necessary to propose a merely naturalistic OOL theory. What were the early earth conditions: temperature, sunlight, atmosphere, salinity, pH, etc.? Was the OOL a singular event (origin) or a coherent plurality of events (origins)? Did life originate on earth or somewhere else (panspermia)? What are the sources of homochirality in sugars and amino acids? How did biopolymers (DNA, RNA, proteins) form in the early earth? How were chemicals concentrated to facilitate biosynthesis (the dilution problem)? How were vulnerable biochemical materials protected from hydrolysis and degradation? Which came first: genetics or metabolism? What is the source of the information encoded in genetic material? What is life? Is life an emergent property?

Today, we see lifeless chemical compounds and we see living cellular organisms whose parents were living creatures, i.e. life giving rise to life. We have no evidence for any collections of semi-living chemicals between these extremes; either now or from the past. As with evolution, a detailed theory of OOL remains elusive, but many scientists enthusiastically and optimistically still persist in the belief that naturalistic answers will eventually be found. Other scientific disciplines accept the actions of an intelligent agent as the best explanation of the evidence including the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI), archeology, cryptography, and forensics. In these fields, once all possible natural explanations for the observations and evidence are eliminated, some other explanation must be pursued, i.e. the action of an intelligent being. With some notable exceptions, the OOL community is not ready to accept the role of a Creator in the origin of life.

Christians spend much time fighting over the proper interpretation of Genesis 1 and 2. Let’s not lose sight of key teachings in Genesis that we all agree upon. God created everything. Everything He created was good. God created everything with the precision of an engineer and the beauty of an artist. And Genesis is not the only Scripture that reveals God the Creator. “God is the builder of everything.” (Hebrews 3) “My help comes from the Lord, the Maker of heaven and earth.” (Psalm 121) “For by [Jesus] all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through Him and for Him.” (Colossians 1) “The Lord is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth.“ (Isaiah 40) “The universe was created by the word of God.” (Hebrews 11) “The heavens declare the glory of God, the sky above proclaims His handiwork.” (Psalm 19) “All things were made through [Jesus], and without Him was not anything made that was made.” (John 1) “For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested on the seventh day.” (Exodus 20) 

We have no reason to fear the science, and every reason to praise our great Creator. If someone tries to intimidate you with science, just remember that the people who do OOL research for a living admit that they have no answers. Be strong and courageous when discussing how life began with unbelievers. Patiently and graciously ask questions, especially if someone knows more science than you do. We have nothing to defend. We are just called to proclaim the truth. Your questions and interest might cause them to rethink what they believe. Your conversation might leave them with a few thoughts that the Holy Spirit will use for them to see God as the Creator and Jesus as the Savior and Lord.


Is There Anything New We Can Learn from David’s Battle with Goliath? (1 Samuel 17)

A quick internet survey provides many life lessons from David’s battle with Goliath including (i) be bigger than your fears, (ii) size doesn’t matter, (iii) make use of what you already have, (iv) believe victory is possible, (v) don’t underestimate your capabilities, (vi) pick the right tools for victory, and (vii) ignore experts who say you’re not up to the task. There’s almost always one thing missing from these life lessons: Jesus, the one who the Bible is all about. If we want to read the Bible as a Christian, we must see how the David and Goliath story is part of God’s redemptive history that all points to Jesus. A faithful reading of the Old and New Testaments finds the Gospel in every verse, not merely a collection of inspiring stories that would be appropriate for a motivational speaker.

After forty days of taunting God and His people, the Philistines met Israel again on the battlefield with the fate of their people at stake. Goliath was a champion soldier who was so big that he had custom-made armor and weapons. No one from Israel had stepped up to fight him, even with enticements of fame and fortune from King Saul. No one in the army thought David could be of any use in the battle. He had not even been enlisted to cook, fetch water, or clean up after the troops. As a child, he was not even trained to use any battle weapons. But David did not just show up that day unprepared. David had faithfully cared for and watched over his sheep, protecting them from small threats to increasingly deadly threats from bears and lions. His faithfulness in small matters prepared him for this significant battle. The stakes were high that day. If David had been killed, none of his descendants would have been born, including Jesus. After David stepped onto the battlefield and killed Goliath, the battle wasn’t over, but Israel’s victory was secured. 

Since Genesis 3, there has been an on-going spiritual battle between God’s people and the forces of evil. When David defeated Israel’s enemy, he foreshadowed Christ who defeated death and the devil at the cross. Like David, Jesus didn’t just show up one day at the cross. Jesus spent a lifetime learning faithfulness and obedience, daily seeking the grace and strength of God. In His final hours, Jesus did what no other god could do: He displayed incredible courage. He could have walked away. He could have called an army of angels to rescue Him. But instead He remained obedient to His Father’s will through a terrible and terrifying ordeal. While Jesus secured victory against sin and death, the battle is not over. God’s people are still commanded to stand up against the forces of evil. Being faithful and doing what is right in the face of fear, threats, danger, and suffering is so important to God that the cowardly and the faithless lead the list of sinners who will suffer the second death in the lake of fire. (Revelation 21) 

Today may be your day to face a significant life battle. Or today may be another day to be faithful in small matters as you prepare for some major, future conflict. Spiritual battles and worldly conflicts occur in our homes, at work, at school, in our neighborhoods, between friends, and with our enemies. These spiritual fights also occur in our own hearts. They damage relationships. They harm society. They have a supernatural dimension (ex. Job 1). If you’ve been sitting on the bench and watching from the sidelines, it’s time to join the fight. If you’ve been fighting for the losing side, it’s time to follow Jesus and join the God who promises that His people will overcome sin, wickedness, and evil, and celebrate an eternal victory with Him in Heaven.


Book Recommendation--Disruptive Witness: Speaking Truth in a Distracted Age by Alan Noble

The gospel is not a personal preference. In “Disruptive Witness”, Alan Noble explains how the growth of alternative belief systems and of activities that provide immediate gratification make the Christian worldview seem like just another lifestyle choice. Once again, the Church’s challenge is to understand and overcome the world’s latest opposition to hearing and comprehending the good news of Jesus Christ. Noble asks us to consider a typical Sunday morning. After sleeping in a climate-controlled home in a comfortable bed, your alarm wakes you. You check your smartphone as you eat a delicious, healthy breakfast. After a hot shower, you dress in clean, comfortable clothes for the drive to church in a modern car on safe, paved roads. During worship, you sing songs and pray about God’s provision, mercy, and grace. But most of your experiences on that morning (and throughout the week) testify to human ingenuity and man’s control over the world. Providence, mystery, and wonder have been largely removed from our thoughts. We need to stop accepting the world’s way of thinking which trivializes the Christian faith. We must repent and shift our affections from creature-comforts and technology to the Creator and Lord of all. Then will we be better equipped to explain the hope of the Gospel in a way that doesn’t sound like we’re just “speaking our truth.” 

Thankfulness has a profound way of realigning our desires and our appreciation of God. Consistently saying grace before a meal (both in private and in public) is a reminder that the food we have is a gift from God to who provides for us because He is kind, and He loves us. Gratitude acknowledges that everything we have is by God’s grace and is one example of a disruptive witness. Another example is delighting in the beauty of the natural world all around us. A sunset. A tree. A storm. A bird. Pausing for a moment allows us to recognize the beauty of creation and draw our attention toward God. An effective disruptive witness cannot be faked for long. Our thoughts and feelings toward God must be an honest expression of what’s in our heart.

Noble makes a strong case that corporate worship cannot be merely about learning Scripture, theology, or any other important aspect of the Christian faith. When the worship service becomes too educationally focused and the sermon resembles a classroom lecture, people will gradually stop gathering on Sunday because they can learn from books, YouTube sermons, podcasts, and a variety of excellent resources at a time and place that better fits their schedule and individual interests. Also people will eventually reach a point where they have learned enough about Christianity, and they will move on to something else. The responsibility for maintaining focus during the corporate time of worship resides with both church leaders and congregants. The gathering of the saints must be about nurturing our love for God, building relationships, and serving our neighbors. In these fellowship times we can both give and receive God’s grace within our Christian community. As Jesus said, our love for God and for one another will be an undeniable and disruptive witness to the world that we are His disciples (John 13). Our time together should “stir up one another to love and good works” in a way that leaves the world wanting to know more about our good, loving, and beautiful God (Hebrews 10).

Why Do We Pray before Meals?

Why do we pray before meals? Is it simply a valuable practice of mindfulness, as Emily Heil seems to indicate in a recent Washington Post article? Is it merely a quaint ritual or a man-made tradition? And most importantly, what does the Bible teach us?

First and foremost, we pray before meals because of the example of Jesus. In Matthew 14:19, Jesus “looked up to heaven and said a blessing” before feeding the 5000. And we see Jesus giving thanks before a meal in Matthew 26:26. But one of the most overlooked texts on this topic is 1 Timothy 4:1-5, which I want to explore with you today.

Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons, through the insincerity of liars whose consciences are seared, who forbid marriage and require abstinence from foods that God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth. For everything created by God is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving, for it is made holy by the word of God and prayer.

According to the apostle Paul, false teachers will arise who have seared consciences and operate under the influence of demonic power. They will lead people to “depart from the faith” through legalistic prohibitions. They will “forbid marriage and require abstinence from foods.” In other words, these false teachers will be religious ascetics who peddle false doctrine dressed up in faux pietism, which includes legalistic dietary restrictions.

But in verses 4-5, Paul tells us why these legalistic dietary restrictions are unbiblical and fly in the face of God who created food “to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth.” 

  • First, everything created by God is good (Genesis 1:31). Paul affirms the inherent goodness of the physical world because a good God created it. And if the physical world is good, then Christians shouldn’t reject anything “if it is received with thanksgiving.” Yes, God imposed certain dietary restrictions in the Old Testament. But through the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus, we have returned to the creational order that was reiterated in Genesis 9:3, where God told Noah, “Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you. And as I gave you the green plants, I give you everything.”

  • Second, our food is “made holy by the word of God and prayer.” That’s striking! Though we can affirm the goodness of all created things, Paul implies that apart from the word of God and prayer, food would still be unclean in some mysterious way. It would be “unsanctified.” Therefore, part of the reason we pray before meals is to give thanks for the inherent goodness of God’s created order. But we also give thanks in order to sanctify our food – to bless the food to our bodies and our bodies to God’s service, as the traditional prayer goes.

Therefore, I would encourage you to reflect on 1 Timothy 4:5 the next time you sit down for a meal. God has given you this food to be received with thanksgiving. It is good as part of God’s creation. But the food is only made holy through the word of God and prayer. So, let us hold fast to the word of God. Let us hold fast to prayer. Let us dedicate our food to the Lord and our bodies to his service. As Paul says elsewhere, “So, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God” (1 Corinthians 10:31).


This Is the Way

When my father died several years ago, my brother and I went through boxes of papers and photos to make sure we had dad’s affairs in order.  We were surprised to find a receipt for the purchase of a house.  The date aligned with a year that our family moved, but it was not for the house we moved to.  The house in question was in a different town and within a different school district. The trajectory of our lives would have shifted dramatically to include an alternate group of friends, summer jobs, teachers, guidance counselors, and neighbors.  I will never know what circumstances interrupted that sale; but I know it was a pivot point in our lives.

I am confident that our Good Shepherd guided our path and my parents’ choice at the time.  We know from Isaiah 30:21 that God directs our paths, “And your ears shall hear a word behind you, saying, ‘This is the way, walk in it,’ when you turn to the right or when you turn to the left.”  David also assured us in Psalm 23:2, “He leads me in paths of righteousness for his name’s sake.”  In Psalm 80:1, Asaph calls out, “Give ear, O Shepherd of Israel, you who lead Joseph like a flock.”

This is only one decision point I know about.  How many other times in each of our lives has the Lord gently moved us in his chosen direction?  Reflecting over the decades I can identify some key turning points where God’s will later became obvious.  Isn’t it marvelous to pause in absolute wonder and gratitude to think about those many moments when we are guided by our shepherd without any awareness!  

I can also recall moments of intense struggle when I sought direction, much like Gideon wanting a sign from God.  Aimee Byrd wrote about why we do not hear a voice from heaven giving instructions: 

But that is not the way God has ordained us to grow in faith.  While he does lead us by his Spirit, we do not hear direct revelation.  And it is only after the fact that I can look back and confirm that, yes, that was the work of the Spirit that prompted me in that direction.  One thing that I can know for sure is that the Spirit never operates apart from his Word” (No Little Women: Equipping All Women in the Household of God, p.235).

People in our culture celebrate coincidence, Kismet, karma, or fate for good jobs or happy relationships. They innately recognize when circumstances come together that are out of their control.  How very sad that they do not know that they are enjoying blessings from their generous God.  As Matthew 5:25 reminds us, “For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good and sends rain on the just and on the unjust.” Would that they directed their appreciation and gratitude to the loving Lord! 

On New Year’s Day, Dayspring.com posted a Facebook message asking, “Who is God calling you to be in 2022?” The answer is simple: me.  He is calling me to be the person he has loved and guided through this earthly sojourn.  He is calling me to continue following where he leads.


Why Minimalism Needs the Gospel of Jesus Christ

The root of minimalism as it’s usually taught is incompatible with the Gospel, but it can be replanted into the soil of the Scripture! 

Minimalism makes some big promises. Among them–having fewer things will–in itself free our minds and hearts to love and connect with others in more meaningful ways. It posits: get rid of anything that is not essential to your life, and you will be able to incorporate meaning into your life. Many of its teachers actually make all the promises that religions make: follow this system and you will experience greater happiness and freedom. Jennifer Barnick, a blogger who has researched the movement said:

“I’m all for the reduction of clutter in your home, the clamping down on mindless spending, and not trying to keep up with the more equals better equals self-esteem equation.  However, it becomes clear they are preaching that Minimalism can solve depression, anxiety, and can give one a sense of purpose and happiness.  That is the bad: the movement is being sold as a religion and not as a good practical virtue to weave into your life. Why is making Minimalism a religion that will cure all of your ills bad?  Why is making Minimalism a religion that will cure all of your ills bad?  It is bad because Minimalism will not cure your depression, anxiety, or give you a sense of purpose and happiness.”

Minimalism can be confusing to Christians because it does offer a fresh start in ways that echo the Gospel and remind us of what is true. It asks its practitioners to make hard choices about what they truly value in life and how to line up your life with those values more intentionally. Hebrews tells us to “throw off the sin that so easily encumbers” (Heb 12:1). Some minimalists say, “throw off whatever is keeping you from being happy,” but Joshua Field Millburn and Ryan Nicodemus, in their book and podcasts have a slightly different brand of minimalism: “throw off whatever is keeping you from living a meaningful life, a present life, a life that is connected fully with others.” They are branding minimalism as a new kind of religion, a religion that will grant you freedom from your anxiety and depression. 

Jesus also teaches a bit, like Millburn and Nicodemus, that it is easier for a camel to get through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to see past the number of his possessions and importance he places on his own role in life to even see his need for the Gospel. Minimalism asks: isn’t everyone in middle-class America a Rich Man? Aren’t we all blinded by ads and shopping and caring for the stuff we already have? And yes, we are!  However, minimalism’s diagnosis is limited, although accurate. Minimalism does not see that our love of things is all tangled up in the other bad things we are unable to stop loving, or the good thing we are incapable of loving enough to pursue them: it’s our sin and fundamental brokenness that’s at the root of materialism and consumerism, not the other way around. 

Now, although minimalism actually promises many of the same things that Jesus and Paul were speaking about in the New Testament (freedom, joy, and peace, to name a few), I think it may be rewarding to dig in a little and see that following minimalism actually doesn’t result in the same kind of freedom. According to Barnick,

“It will work for a while—especially if you go all out and quit your job, get rid of all of your stuff, and perhaps build a tiny house on wheels.  Of course, it will work for a while—just like binge buying or drinking or falling in love—while you are in the adventure of mania you will not feel depression or anxiety.  You will have a wild sense of purpose and people usually feel euphoric when high—that’s why drugs and religious movements draw in masses of people.  However, people will and do come down.”

Minimalism offers initial freedom, because the feeling of moral release from possessions that only remind you of your failures or that only weigh on you with no reward–all of that is gone. But then what is there?  Barnick “spent hours watching “Why I’m no longer a Minimalist” videos on YouTube. One of the saddest videos was of a young woman who admitted that Minimalism taken to the extreme, had made her feel ‘sad,’ ‘burdened,’ ‘stuck,’ ‘guilty,’ and ‘unable to express herself anymore.’ The truth is, for the people who pursued Minimalism to free themselves from despair, stress, and meaninglessness found they ended up a little worse off than when they began. In other words, like all manias, “there is a Minimalist hangover.” 

Barnick’s explanation clearly shows that minimalism isn’t freedom. It’s the same old Law that Jesus came to free us from. Jesus came to break the power that sin gives to the law: power to condemn us, to point a finger at all the ways we are still falling short. Jesus took that finger in his heart when he died on the cross. Now all the laws–the Mosaic law, as well as the law of minimalism–we can be freed from. Instead of feeling the guilt of not living up to another self-help book (or makeover show for that matter), the Gospel helps us walk in wholeness, and embrace our lives and those around us, no matter what they happen to look like at the moment. God will enter and change us as we learn to live in that truth more and more. 

There is one last connection, though, with minimalism. One of the things that God often does in the lives of Christians is give them a different relationship with our things. We may have been afraid of not having enough before, but trusting God can make us able to embrace others by sharing our food, possessions, and money. If we pray that God will show us how, He is certain to show us the way to break the hold that money and possessions have over our hearts. Let’s live into that and see what kind of freedom God can give us from our things. Let’s ask him for opportunities to reach our ears, grab our hearts, and move our hands.